Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Forest Service plans for housing construction (map) at the Putt-Putt trailhead threaten wildlife habitat and open spaces that make Jackson Hole the unique alpine haven we love.  

Funding for this housing sprawl comes from auctioning high-dollar Forest Service real estate on North Cache for commercial development where there is plenty of land for more employee housing–without disturbing wildlife and destroying open space.

Please learn the facts and join us to help save a piece of our Town’s most cherished open space.  We will use this site to update you on the happenings affect the future of the Putt-Putt trail area, so tune in here and stay informed.

1.    THE LAW:    Dogs must be on leash at the trailhead

The sign says–”This is wildlife’s home. Your help is needed for their survival.”

2.    THE ENFORCEMENT:  Forest Service officers issue $100 citations

Trail users must respect wildlife . . . and respect the law.

3.    THE BENEFIT:  After ten years, bighorn sheep have returned to the area

This area is critical winter wildlife habitat for moose, elk, deer, fox and sheep.

4.    THE PARADOX:  This is exactly where the Forest Service plans to cut a road and erect up to 18 new homes.

 We support any Forest Service efforts to protect wildlife in this pristine place both now . . . and forever.

The Forest Service relies upon legislation known as FSFREA for authority to sell its high-dollar real estate on North Cache for commercial development.  But this project abuses Congressional intent and agency policy for FSFREA. 

Our latest letters to decision-makers explain this FSFREA abuse:

  • Congress only intended that FSFREA be used to sell “excess and unneeded land and facilities.”  NFS – letter 1-1-10.
  • Agency policy limits FSFREA sales to those with “support from public.” NFS – letter 1-18-10.

This abuse of FSFREA–auctioning off our valuable public asset in downtown Jackson–risks loosing the authority for future legitimate uses.

BUSTED

The Conservation Alliance uncovered evidence that this whole thing was rigged.  According to the Jackson Hole News & Guide, documents in Forest Service files prove that it already is spending money from its “proposed” sale of North Cache property to build a new Big Piney Ranger District Office building (Sale is Rigged).

It gets worse.  We have evidence that the Bridger-Teton has been spending funds borrowed against its future sales of OUR public lands since 2007 (EA Comment – 11-30-09 at page 11).

“Add the Jackson Town Council to the list of entities that oppose the sale of national forest land on North Cache Street,” reports the Jackson Hole News & Guide (article).

The Town Council unanimously endorsed a letter to Bridger-Teton National Forest, detailing the council’s opposition to the sale of our land along North Cache (Town of Jackson – letter 11-30-09).

Thank you to the Mayor and Town Councilors.

Hello Washington

The local Forest Service claims it has no other funding source to meet it facilities maintenance needs, so it must auction off its land. 

How can this be true?

Grand Teton National Park got a $13 million “presidentially directed” earmark to build more employee housing.  But the whole state of Wyoming got no “Congressionally directed spending items” in the FY2010 budget for all our federal lands state-wide. We are one of four states with no Congressional “earmarks” for our federal lands.

How can this be true?

FY 2010 appropriations include $500 million in discretionary funds for Forest Service facilities improvement.  Yet we have none of that.

How can this be true?

The BTNF applied for $9 million in Recovery Act funds for facilities construction, and the Regional Office withdrew the application.

Someone must really want to sell that prime piece of real estate on North Cache.

But, unanswered questions cause concern:

  • How much housing is enough?
  • Why disturb virgin forest when other alternatives have no environmental impact?
  • With a better housing allowance, why can’t employees find existing housing in Town?
  • Why not work with the Housing Trust to develop affordable employee housing in Town–the School Board did and the Hospital did?